A Principle for All Seasons
Once upon a time, Democrats wouldn't have dreamed of eliminating funds for soldiers in the field.
Ah, how times change.
Ah, how times change.
posted by LadybugUSA at 8:14 PM
Thursday, April 05, 2007
Contact & Other Information
Contributors
Key Links
Previous Posts
- Convenient Oversights
- An Essential Distinction
- Not Only "Counterproductive" but "Foolish"
- A Disgrace (To Her Country & Her Gender)
- Worrisome
- Wake Up Call for McCain
- What a Great Guy!
- If We Don't Say It, It Isn't Happening
- Unbelievable Appeasers
- A Headline that Says It All
3 Comments:
If boy King Bush vetoes the funding, it is Bush who is not funding the troops, not the Democrats.
Yeah, right, ETC. They insist on withdrawal dates that Bush has adamantly opposed, which Petraus also sternly opposed, fill it with pork to bribe enough Dem votes, and Bush is supposed to pass it. Bush isn't vetoing the funding. He's vetoing the Dem arrogance of believing they have the right to conduct the war. They know what's required of them by duty alone, and they continue to play games that risk lives. Shame on them and shame on you for supporting them.
That dog won't hunt, Earth (Opposite).
Post a Comment
<< Home